GayatriS
06-22 04:58 PM
Yes, I read this article and wanted to read more so I searched for the study this refered to. Here is a link: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=991327
I think everyone must read this study.
Gayatri
I think everyone must read this study.
Gayatri
wallpaper call of duty lack ops map
madhu_rao73
08-19 12:40 PM
Hi, i have applied my labor application eb3 in 2003 august and got approveed, applied 140 and 485 in july 2007 and i am on EAD
i came to USA on Company A in august 2000 and moved to Company B on 2003 march and applied for green card in EB3
now my company A is willing to apply my gc in EB2 and capture EB3 pd
but my lawyer says if my EB2 gets rejected they may not issue my GC saying that my new job is not same or similar (he says eb3 job which does not require Master is not same as EB2 which requires Master or 5+ years exp)
Company A and Company B are belongs to same management so the compnay is ready to do my EB2, but my lawyer is telling there is lot of risk involved
Please Advice
Thanks
i came to USA on Company A in august 2000 and moved to Company B on 2003 march and applied for green card in EB3
now my company A is willing to apply my gc in EB2 and capture EB3 pd
but my lawyer says if my EB2 gets rejected they may not issue my GC saying that my new job is not same or similar (he says eb3 job which does not require Master is not same as EB2 which requires Master or 5+ years exp)
Company A and Company B are belongs to same management so the compnay is ready to do my EB2, but my lawyer is telling there is lot of risk involved
Please Advice
Thanks
jelo
12-10 04:07 PM
Myself and my wife got first EADs with expiration of Sept 17, 2008. We both applied for renewal on July 14th, 2008 with TSC and my wife got her EAD under a month. My wife is using it work, where as I am still on valid H1b. My application was pending still then, I have called USCIS and put an expedite request on Oct 17, 2008. On Dec 3rd, my case status online updated saying, case transfered to one of the local office. I got a paper notice after 2 days saying:
for faster processing we have transfered your case to the following location.
and nothing in the next line, blank.
Even though I assume this was to faster my process, just wanted to know whether any of you have faced this.
Appreciate your reply.
for faster processing we have transfered your case to the following location.
and nothing in the next line, blank.
Even though I assume this was to faster my process, just wanted to know whether any of you have faced this.
Appreciate your reply.
2011 Call of Duty: Black Ops
vls
07-24 03:44 PM
If we lose our job after having the I-485 pending for more than 8 months, I-140 approved, how much time do we have to find another job?
Do we have to immediately withdraw the petition after losing/quiting a job?
Thanks!
Do we have to immediately withdraw the petition after losing/quiting a job?
Thanks!
more...
bestin
10-02 06:32 AM
I was under the impression that they send only one notice for each case and that too to the attorney.My attorney has send me a mail that he received the receipt notices and the original would have been sent to the employer.In case the employer has not received,he will send me a copy.
Do i need to have the original receipts.I have a valid L1 stamping and planning to travel early next month.I heard that i need to have atleast receipt notices if i dont have the AP approval by then.
Do i need to have the original receipts.I have a valid L1 stamping and planning to travel early next month.I heard that i need to have atleast receipt notices if i dont have the AP approval by then.
eb3_nepa
08-13 03:17 PM
http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4328.html
more...
go_guy123
12-11 09:20 AM
This is my first post.
The green card backlog situation seems hopeless to me.
Is this organization working to get the
totalization agreement done so that at least we get some of the money that
we paid as taxes(but get no benefit in return).
Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
The green card backlog situation seems hopeless to me.
Is this organization working to get the
totalization agreement done so that at least we get some of the money that
we paid as taxes(but get no benefit in return).
Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
2010 Call of Duty Black Ops HD
Blog Feeds
07-22 04:20 PM
From the ACLU which is part of the coalition that is behind this suit: Implementation Of Arizona's Racial Profiling Law FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE July 22, 2010 PHOENIX � At a hearing today in a federal court in Phoenix, the American Civil Liberties Union and a coalition of civil rights groups argued that Arizona's discriminatory new law, known as SB 1070, should be blocked pending a final court ruling on its constitutionality. The law, scheduled to go into effect on July 29, requires police to demand "papers" from people they stop who they suspect are "unlawfully present" in the U.S. According...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/07/first-court-arguments-heard-over-arizona-law.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/07/first-court-arguments-heard-over-arizona-law.html)
more...
jthomas
06-01 03:35 PM
better way
1. H1B transfer
safe,
1. Use your EAD
2. AC-21
I have read a lot og H1B denials so i am myself going to file AC-21. (no H1B transfer)
1. H1B transfer
safe,
1. Use your EAD
2. AC-21
I have read a lot og H1B denials so i am myself going to file AC-21. (no H1B transfer)
hair lack-ops-wallpaper-HD.jpg
ravi98
09-27 01:23 PM
The 7 Funniest Lines From Colbert's Testimony To Congress (PHOTOS) (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/24/stephen-colbert-congress_n_738149.html)
more...
Macaca
02-18 06:55 PM
Some paras from In Majority, Democrats Run Hill Much as GOP Did (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/17/AR2007021701352.html).
Democrats pledged to bring courtesy to the Capitol when they assumed control of Congress last month. But from the start, the new majority used its muscle to force through its agenda in the House and sideline Republicans.
And after an initial burst of lawmaking, the Democratic juggernaut has kept on rolling.
Of nine major bills passed by the House since the 110th Congress began, Republicans have been allowed to make amendments to just one, a measure directing federal research into additives to biofuels. In the arcane world of Capitol Hill, where the majority dictates which legislation comes before the House and which dies on a shelf, the ability to offer amendments from the floor is one of the minority's few tools.
Last week, the strong-arming continued during the most important debate the Congress has faced yet -- the discussion about the Iraq war. Democrats initially said they would allow Republicans to propose one alternative to the resolution denouncing a troop buildup but, days later, they thought better of it.
And yet, significant numbers of House Republicans have voted along with Democrats on the legislation passed so far -- a fact that somewhat mutes criticism about iron-fisted tactics.
In the first weeks of the new Congress, however, Democrats bypassed the usual legislative committees, refused to allow any amendments and took their agenda straight to the floor for passage. They said they needed a clear path to pass a handful of popular measures that were the basis of their successful November campaign, including expanded money for stem cell research, an increase in the federal minimum wage and implementation of recommendations of the Sept. 11 commission.
Democrats said they would impose "regular order," the rules that permit the minority to participate more widely, in short order.
But even after passing their domestic agenda, Democratic leaders have continued to marginalize Republicans, preventing them from having a voice in legislation such as a bill to withhold federal pensions from lawmakers convicted of ethics felonies and a $463 billion bill to fund the federal government for the rest of this fiscal year.
Last week's debate on the Iraq war, culminating in its passage Friday by a vote of 246 to 182, was conducted under a "closed rule," which means Republicans could not offer alternatives. "I understand what they did on their agenda," said Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho). "But to do a closed rule on something like this is a huge mistake. We're talking about war and peace. You don't play politics with war."
While they did not allow amendments on the Iraq debate, the Democrats gave every member of the chamber five minutes to speak on the resolution -- an unprecedented amount of debate on a nonbinding resolution, according to Thomas E. Mann, a scholar at Brookings Institution. He said that is more than the Republicans offered Democrats when the GOP passed a resolution last spring supporting the war in Iraq.
Democrats pledged to bring courtesy to the Capitol when they assumed control of Congress last month. But from the start, the new majority used its muscle to force through its agenda in the House and sideline Republicans.
And after an initial burst of lawmaking, the Democratic juggernaut has kept on rolling.
Of nine major bills passed by the House since the 110th Congress began, Republicans have been allowed to make amendments to just one, a measure directing federal research into additives to biofuels. In the arcane world of Capitol Hill, where the majority dictates which legislation comes before the House and which dies on a shelf, the ability to offer amendments from the floor is one of the minority's few tools.
Last week, the strong-arming continued during the most important debate the Congress has faced yet -- the discussion about the Iraq war. Democrats initially said they would allow Republicans to propose one alternative to the resolution denouncing a troop buildup but, days later, they thought better of it.
And yet, significant numbers of House Republicans have voted along with Democrats on the legislation passed so far -- a fact that somewhat mutes criticism about iron-fisted tactics.
In the first weeks of the new Congress, however, Democrats bypassed the usual legislative committees, refused to allow any amendments and took their agenda straight to the floor for passage. They said they needed a clear path to pass a handful of popular measures that were the basis of their successful November campaign, including expanded money for stem cell research, an increase in the federal minimum wage and implementation of recommendations of the Sept. 11 commission.
Democrats said they would impose "regular order," the rules that permit the minority to participate more widely, in short order.
But even after passing their domestic agenda, Democratic leaders have continued to marginalize Republicans, preventing them from having a voice in legislation such as a bill to withhold federal pensions from lawmakers convicted of ethics felonies and a $463 billion bill to fund the federal government for the rest of this fiscal year.
Last week's debate on the Iraq war, culminating in its passage Friday by a vote of 246 to 182, was conducted under a "closed rule," which means Republicans could not offer alternatives. "I understand what they did on their agenda," said Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho). "But to do a closed rule on something like this is a huge mistake. We're talking about war and peace. You don't play politics with war."
While they did not allow amendments on the Iraq debate, the Democrats gave every member of the chamber five minutes to speak on the resolution -- an unprecedented amount of debate on a nonbinding resolution, according to Thomas E. Mann, a scholar at Brookings Institution. He said that is more than the Republicans offered Democrats when the GOP passed a resolution last spring supporting the war in Iraq.
hot -lack-ops-wallpaper-HD-1.
rajeshkrv
02-17 02:45 PM
thanks satish. that was informative
more...
house Be$t Cod Black Ops Sniping
vayumahesh
06-11 08:31 AM
Probably C09.
tattoo Hd Maps: Call Of Duty: Black
GC_dude
03-30 10:05 PM
Pl. advise what all documents do I need to send to USCIS for extending stay on visitor visa for my parents.From all the sources I read so far here is the list of documents that I feel that needs to included :
1)I-539
2)Letter to USCIS (from me the sponsor) explaining the reason for extending the stay.Please post any letter format that I can use.
3)Copy of parents passport
4)Copy of I-94
5)Copy of original return ticket (with return date in 6 month from 1st entry)
6)$300 fees
Questions :
Do I need to sent I-131
Do I need to send bank statement and recenet paychecks
Do I need to buy new ticket for extended date and send a copy?
This is a last minute decision.I-94 expires in 3 weeks.PLease help .
Thanks
Ram
1)I-539
2)Letter to USCIS (from me the sponsor) explaining the reason for extending the stay.Please post any letter format that I can use.
3)Copy of parents passport
4)Copy of I-94
5)Copy of original return ticket (with return date in 6 month from 1st entry)
6)$300 fees
Questions :
Do I need to sent I-131
Do I need to send bank statement and recenet paychecks
Do I need to buy new ticket for extended date and send a copy?
This is a last minute decision.I-94 expires in 3 weeks.PLease help .
Thanks
Ram
more...
pictures Black Ops Live Commentary | Le
Blog Feeds
10-04 11:10 PM
Senator Grassley corresponds with USCIS Director Mayorkas regarding fraud in the H-1B program. Issues such as the benefits fraud assessment and potential anti-fraud initiatives are suggested.
Continue Reading (http://ashwinsharma.com/files/4941-4844/__grassley_letter.pdf)
More... (http://ashwinsharma.com/2009/10/01/letter-from-senator-grassley-to-director-mayorkas-on-h1b-program.aspx?ref=rss)
Continue Reading (http://ashwinsharma.com/files/4941-4844/__grassley_letter.pdf)
More... (http://ashwinsharma.com/2009/10/01/letter-from-senator-grassley-to-director-mayorkas-on-h1b-program.aspx?ref=rss)
dresses lack ops wallpaper hd. cod
Bluejay
05-26 10:43 AM
I am working for a small company on H1B since October 2006. The company had originally filed for full time employment (LCA and I-129) but at the time of hiring offered part time employment. I worked part time till June 2008 and since then I have been working full time. The company however never filed for an amended LCA and/or I-129 and I worked part-time on a full-time LCA and I-129. My H1B approval was extended last October by another 3 years. I also work part-time for a University on a concurrent H1B.
Will I be deemed out of status for this? What are the implications of this on filing for GC under EB1 or EB2? Is there any way in which this situation may be legally rectified?
Please advise.
Will I be deemed out of status for this? What are the implications of this on filing for GC under EB1 or EB2? Is there any way in which this situation may be legally rectified?
Please advise.
more...
makeup lack ops prestige emblems hd.
kashyapjv
07-19 03:06 AM
During the month of June, when the dates were announced in July Bulletin, that all the EB are CURRENT, we were prepared to apply. But my wife has some health issues and after the July2nd news, she left to India for Treatment. As per doctors now she can't travel till end of August. My questions are:
1) If I apply for my I-485, at what stage in I-485 can i add my wife as a dependant so she also gets her EAD and AP along with me?
2) Somewhere on the internet, I have seen that I can apply for my spouse's Green card 180 days after my Green card approval also as long as we were married before my I-485 was applied. Is this true? Can someone please confirm?
3) Curretnly my wife is on H-1B and she still has 5more years on it. Can I apply for her I-485 once the dates open up again?
Please advice as what are the best options?
1) If I apply for my I-485, at what stage in I-485 can i add my wife as a dependant so she also gets her EAD and AP along with me?
2) Somewhere on the internet, I have seen that I can apply for my spouse's Green card 180 days after my Green card approval also as long as we were married before my I-485 was applied. Is this true? Can someone please confirm?
3) Curretnly my wife is on H-1B and she still has 5more years on it. Can I apply for her I-485 once the dates open up again?
Please advice as what are the best options?
girlfriend Call of Duty: Black Ops
ashrock11
09-13 08:15 PM
Hi,
My I-485 case was approved on 7/23, got approval letter on 7/30.
In August I got the Code 3 Biometrics letter and now I got it for Code 2. Two Biometrics appointment within a month!
Does this usually happen? No CPO e-mails or card yet!
Thanks
My I-485 case was approved on 7/23, got approval letter on 7/30.
In August I got the Code 3 Biometrics letter and now I got it for Code 2. Two Biometrics appointment within a month!
Does this usually happen? No CPO e-mails or card yet!
Thanks
hairstyles Black Ops Hd Desktop
snathan
02-05 03:20 PM
Hello,
My I-140 was approved in August 2009 and my PD is Jan-2004 (EB3). I want to know when i can apply for I-485, should i have to wait till my PD becomes Current or is there any other way by which i can file the I-485. Please shed some light on this topic and thanks for your time and effort.
Thanks ! ! :confused: :rolleyes:
You need to wait for your PD become current...may be in 2019.
good luck.
My I-140 was approved in August 2009 and my PD is Jan-2004 (EB3). I want to know when i can apply for I-485, should i have to wait till my PD becomes Current or is there any other way by which i can file the I-485. Please shed some light on this topic and thanks for your time and effort.
Thanks ! ! :confused: :rolleyes:
You need to wait for your PD become current...may be in 2019.
good luck.
PraveenVadlam
02-23 08:52 AM
I have the following questions with respect to number of days I can stay out of the country for my situation.
I have been on green card since June 2010.
I have visited India from October 17' 2010 to Feb 4' 2011 (Total 111 Days).
Now I need to go back to India again for around 3 months (Approx 10th May - 10th Aug) which is about 93 Days.
My questions are:
1. As a GC holder can I make the above visits without resetting my 'Continuity of 5 Yeard of Residence' clock ? As in each calender year I will not be out of country for greater than 180 days. But, when you count from October 16 2010 - October 15 2011, I will be more than 180 days out of the country.
2. If answer to the above question is NO, do I need to file/apply for any exception to be out of country?
Thanks for your advise.
Praveen
I have been on green card since June 2010.
I have visited India from October 17' 2010 to Feb 4' 2011 (Total 111 Days).
Now I need to go back to India again for around 3 months (Approx 10th May - 10th Aug) which is about 93 Days.
My questions are:
1. As a GC holder can I make the above visits without resetting my 'Continuity of 5 Yeard of Residence' clock ? As in each calender year I will not be out of country for greater than 180 days. But, when you count from October 16 2010 - October 15 2011, I will be more than 180 days out of the country.
2. If answer to the above question is NO, do I need to file/apply for any exception to be out of country?
Thanks for your advise.
Praveen
webm
06-12 06:11 PM
hopefully they will give the extension from my expiry date which is Aug 28th 2008.--- Yes they will...
No comments:
Post a Comment